cuspera logo CUSPERA

Xactly Connect vs Nice Performance Management: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Xactly Connect vs. Nice Performance Management is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 697 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Xactly Connect and Nice Performance Management

Xactly Connect, and Nice Performance Management belong to a category of solutions that help Sales Performance Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Xactly Connect covers Performance Management, Sales Commission Management, Forecasting with User Generated Content, Helpdesk Management, etc.

Nice Performance Management focuses on Sales Call Management with Phone Calls, Performance Management, Engagement Management with Phone Calls, Helpdesk Management with Phone Calls, etc.

"Since implementing Xactly, we've been able to free up a lot of critical time to focus on growing the business. Xactly allowed us to achieve this by automating all the painful and lengthy compensation processes. " - James Mayfield

"Telia Finland Oyj has not only experienced dramatic improvements to call handling times and contact center productivity—we have also seen significant improvements in customer satisfaction since deploying the NICE RPA solution. " - Topias Huovinen

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Xactly Connect

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo Nice Performance Management

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Sales Performance Management Platform with an Open, Standards-Based API For Seamless Data Integration

Nice Performance Management | Consolidate Data, Operationalize Opportunities and Drive Engagement

Age

2005

Financials

M&A

IPO

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

25

22

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

9

6

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


performance management


sales commission management



helpdesk management


payment management


sales incentive management


motivation management


relationship management


competitive intelligence


engagement management

engaging and following up



social media management




sales call management


tracking & monitoring communications


communication management

tracking & monitoring communications


contact list management


measuring customer satisfaction


customer feedback management

measuring customer satisfaction


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve ROI

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Improve efficiency

  • Acquire customers

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Grow market share

  • Manage risk

  • See 6 more
  • Improve efficiency

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Acquire customers

  • Improve visibility

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • See 3 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • phone calls

  • e-mail

  • phone calls

  • e-mail

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

No Data

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting