cuspera logo CUSPERA

Acquia Drupal vs Hyland ECM: 2025 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Acquia Drupal vs. Hyland ECM is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 2344 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Acquia Drupal and Hyland ECM

Acquia Drupal, Hyland ECM, Concrete CMS, PageTiger, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Content Management Systems. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Acquia Drupal covers Workflow Management, Engagement Management with Website, Content Management with Website, Helpdesk Management, etc.

Hyland ECM focuses on Content Management, Workflow Management, Collaboration, Sales Document Management, etc.

"When the deadly Hurricane Harvey slammed Houston for over two weeks in 2017, it was critical for Rice to maintain reliable, effective communication with their community, not to mention with nervous parents and students. By having a monolithic theme ...out, Rice could use Acquia Site Factory to instantly broadcast important emergency and safety information across 280 sites. " - Rice University

"This is one of the biggest technology projects in OUP’s history, and I am immensely proud to see the platform now rolling out across the organization. " - Kate Granville

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Acquia Drupal

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo Hyland ECM

Focus area

Hyland ECM is better than Acquia Drupal for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

About

The premier open source digital experience software

Organize and optimize all content and assets across the entire organization.

Age

1991

Financials

SERIES G

M&A

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

35

47

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

11

9

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


engagement management

engaging and following up


workflow management


content publishing


helpdesk management



communication management

sending & publishing communications




training & onboarding




performance management


sales document management

contract management


customer feedback management

measuring customer satisfaction


compliance & governance


knowledge management


customer case management


social media analytics


social media management

social media analytics


lead qualification: technographic


lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic



follower management


promotion management


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Acquire customers

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Improve efficiency

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Build brand awareness

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve internal communications

  • Grow market share

  • Improve brand engagement

  • Manage risk

  • See 8 more
  • Acquire customers

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Scale best practices

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve visibility

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Improve ROI

  • Establish thought leadership

  • See 6 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • mobile

  • offline

  • point of sale

  • website

  • social media

  • mobile app

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • phone calls

  • promotions

  • on premises

  • e-mail

  • video

  • See 10 more
  • mobile

  • offline

  • point of sale

  • website

  • social media

  • mobile app

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • phone calls

  • promotions

  • on premises

  • e-mail

  • video

  • See 10 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting