Comparison Summary
This comparison report of Kentico Web Content Management vs. Hyland ECM is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 4826 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.
Introducing Kentico Web Content Management and Hyland ECM
Kentico Web Content Management, Hyland ECM, Sitefinity, Adobe Experience Manager, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Content Management Systems. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.
Kentico Web Content Management covers Content Management with Website, Engagement Management with Website, Workflow Management with Website, Helpdesk Management, etc.
Hyland ECM focuses on Content Management, Workflow Management, Collaboration, Sales Document Management, etc.
"It was a win-win situation We were not only able to bring in our know-how and project experience in general, but we had the experience from a concrete project from within the same corporate group. Many of the templates and modules were more or less ...ready for use and only had to be adapted accordingly. Thus, the time pressure factor could be somewhat diminished. " - Gerhard Handler
"Today, in order to support our major real estate construction project, we have a clear way to monitor the approval cycle of different documents and are using Alfresco for our day-to-day collaboration. What I really like about Alfresco is that the re...pository is straightforward. It’s simple but robust compared to other solutions. " - Paul Janssen
Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.
Kentico Web Content Management
Focus area
Kentico Web Content Management is better than Hyland ECM for
Software Failure Risk
About
Kentico: .NET CMS, E-commerce & Online Marketing Platform
Organize and optimize all content and assets across the entire organization.
Age
2004
1991
Financials
PRIVATE
M&A
Business Need
Total Processes
(we found evidences for)
76
47
Total Goals
(we found evidences for)
16
9
Top Processes
Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction
Top Goals
Goals Achieved
-
Acquire customers
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Enter new markets internationally or locally
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Improve ROI
-
Scale best practices
-
Build brand awareness
-
Grow market share
-
Improve efficiency
-
Improve brand engagement
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Launch new products
-
Reduce bounce
-
Establish thought leadership
-
Manage risk
- See 13 more
-
Acquire customers
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Scale best practices
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Improve efficiency
-
Improve visibility
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Improve ROI
-
Establish thought leadership
- See 6 more
Top Channels
Channels Used
-
mobile
-
offline
-
point of sale
-
website
-
social media
-
mobile app
-
user generated content
-
blogs
-
phone calls
-
promotions
-
on premises
-
e-mail
-
video
- See 10 more
-
mobile
-
offline
-
point of sale
-
website
-
social media
-
mobile app
-
user generated content
-
blogs
-
phone calls
-
promotions
-
on premises
-
e-mail
-
video
- See 10 more
Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?
Compliance Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Security & Privacy Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Integration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Migration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
IT and Other Capabilities
- Low
- Medium
- High
