cuspera logo CUSPERA

Umbraco CMS vs Strapi: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Umbraco CMS vs. Strapi is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 2650 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Umbraco CMS and Strapi

Umbraco CMS, Strapi, ExpressionEngine CMS, dotCMS, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Content Management Systems. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Umbraco CMS covers Content Management with Website, Workflow Management, Training & Onboarding with Website, Engagement Management with Website, etc.

Strapi focuses on Content Management, Communication Management with Website, Generation Of New Leads, Community Building with Social Media, etc.

"In 2018, National Geographic, in collaboration with DotControl, completely renewed the website of the National Geographic Photo Contest. It was a challenging project in which the CMS had to comply with complex user stories for different types of use...rs. The end result: a very nice website and tailor-made CMS that the entire team is proud of! " - Dorien Beckers

"Anybody can download Strapi and run it on their own server. You can then develop your front end, fetch content in your mobile app using the Strapi API and more. " - Romain Dillet

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Umbraco CMS

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

logo Strapi

Focus area

Strapi is better than Umbraco CMS for

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Umbraco: Open Source ASP .NET CMS | Open Source CMS

Leading open-source headless CMS

Age

2001

Financials

PRIVATE

SERIES B

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

50

43

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

10

9

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


searching for content

content publishing


workflow management


training & onboarding


communication management

sending & publishing communications



engagement management

engaging and following up



campaign management

campaign analytics

campaign monitoring



products & pricelist management


generation of new leads


community building


category management


social media management


helpdesk management


competitive intelligence


sales document management

proposal & quote management


lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic



distribution management



Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Acquire customers

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Scale best practices

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Build brand awareness

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Grow market share

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve internal communications

  • See 7 more
  • Acquire customers

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Scale best practices

  • Grow market share

  • Improve internal communications

  • Build brand awareness

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve ROI

  • See 6 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • website

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • mobile

  • e-mail

  • video

  • mobile app

  • promotions

  • coupons

  • offline

  • on premises

  • social media

  • Facebook

  • point of sale

  • print media

  • newspaper

  • See 13 more
  • website

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • mobile

  • e-mail

  • video

  • mobile app

  • promotions

  • coupons

  • offline

  • on premises

  • social media

  • Facebook

  • point of sale

  • print media

  • newspaper

  • See 13 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

high

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting