cuspera logo CUSPERA

YetiForce CRM vs Jobber: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of YetiForce CRM vs. Jobber is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 4079 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing YetiForce CRM and Jobber

YetiForce CRM, LinxCRM, Oracle CRM On Demand, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help CRM, whereas Jobber, ServiceTrade, ServiceM8, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Field Service Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

YetiForce CRM covers Contact List Management with Phone Calls, Sales Document Management, Helpdesk Management with Phone Calls, Workflow Management, etc.

Jobber focuses on Sales Document Management with E-Mail, Helpdesk Management with Phone Calls, Engagement Management with E-Mail, Workflow Management, etc.

"It really has amazing functionality once you set it up to fit your business. I have been using it for almost 2 years and there was never a thought to find a replacement for this CRM. Especially that there are modules that aren't free in other system...s and you can have an unlimited number of users also for free. " - Zuzanna Siwecka

"WE’VE BEEN ABLE TO CUT OUR NON-BILLABLE HOURS BY 50%. The crew logs their hours into each job they’re working on, which gives me better estimates, which leads to more sales. " - Greg P

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo YetiForce CRM

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo Jobber

Focus area

Jobber is better than YetiForce CRM for

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

An open source application that is constantly being improved

Jobber: The #1 Service Scheduling Software & App

Financials

PRIVATE

SERIES A

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

29

56

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

4

11

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


contact list management


sales document management

contract management

proposal & quote management


helpdesk management


workflow management


engagement management

engaging and following up



training & onboarding


products & pricelist management


relationship management



communication management


social media management

social media analytics


campaign management


customer feedback management


billing and invoice management


generation of new leads




rating and review management




lifetime value management



payment management


personalized marketing


lead qualification: technographic


lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic



referral management


knowledge management


business development


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Improve efficiency

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Acquire customers

  • See 1 more
  • Acquire customers

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve internal communications

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Launch new products

  • Build brand awareness

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Improve consistency

  • Scale best practices

  • Grow market share

  • See 8 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • e-mail

  • website

  • text SMS

  • phone calls

  • chat

  • social media

  • promotions

  • mobile

  • support groups

  • Instagram

  • offline

  • point of sale

  • Facebook

  • mobile app

  • games

  • video

  • Slack

  • See 14 more
  • e-mail

  • website

  • text SMS

  • phone calls

  • chat

  • social media

  • promotions

  • mobile

  • support groups

  • Instagram

  • offline

  • point of sale

  • Facebook

  • mobile app

  • games

  • video

  • Slack

  • See 14 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting