Comparison Summary
This comparison report of Kentico Web Content Management vs. Onbase by Hyland is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 4622 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.
Introducing Kentico Web Content Management and Onbase by Hyland
Kentico Web Content Management, Onbase by Hyland, Sitefinity, Adobe Experience Manager, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Content Management Systems. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.
Kentico Web Content Management covers Content Management with Website, Engagement Management with Website, Workflow Management with Website, Helpdesk Management, etc.
Onbase by Hyland focuses on Workflow Management, Content Management, Sales Document Management, Helpdesk Management with Phone Calls, etc.
"With its feature-rich functionality, easy-to-use content management capabilities, and competitive price, Kentico offered the best CMS on the market. The website enables the Haig Park team to be genuinely independent of developers. It allows the deve...lopment team and Haig Park Experiments team to move at speed, and it was critical to the successful, on-time delivery of the website. " - Obelia Tait
"Our OnBase system has assisted with getting better billing accuracy. Before OnBase, our billing process was manual and complicated. Our workflows are now simpler and more accurate. They’re less error-prone, too. " - Carl Fravel
Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.
Kentico Web Content Management
Focus area
Kentico Web Content Management is better than Onbase by Hyland for
Software Failure Risk
About
Kentico: .NET CMS, E-commerce & Online Marketing Platform
Enterprise information platform designed to manage content, processes and cases.
Age
2004
1991
Financials
PRIVATE
M&A
Business Need
Total Processes
(we found evidences for)
76
42
Total Goals
(we found evidences for)
16
8
Top Processes
Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction
Top Goals
Goals Achieved
-
Acquire customers
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Enter new markets internationally or locally
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Improve ROI
-
Scale best practices
-
Build brand awareness
-
Grow market share
-
Improve efficiency
-
Improve brand engagement
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Launch new products
-
Reduce bounce
-
Establish thought leadership
-
Manage risk
- See 13 more
-
Acquire customers
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Improve ROI
-
Scale best practices
-
Improve efficiency
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Grow market share
-
Manage risk
- See 5 more
Top Channels
Channels Used
-
offline
-
social media
-
on premises
-
point of sale
-
user generated content
-
phone calls
-
games
-
e-mail
- See 5 more
-
offline
-
social media
-
on premises
-
point of sale
-
user generated content
-
phone calls
-
games
-
e-mail
- See 5 more
Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?
Compliance Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Security & Privacy Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Integration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Migration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
IT and Other Capabilities
- Low
- Medium
- High
