Comparison Summary
This comparison report of Microsoft Sharepoint vs. Responsive, formerly RFPIO is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 56547 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.
Introducing Microsoft Sharepoint and Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Microsoft Sharepoint, Egnyte, Drupal CMS, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Content Management Systems, whereas Responsive, formerly RFPIO, Loopio RFP, ClientPoint, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Proposal Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.
Microsoft Sharepoint covers Collaboration, Content Management, Sales Document Management, Workflow Management, etc.
Responsive, formerly RFPIO focuses on Sales Document Management, Collaboration, Content Management, Workflow Management, etc.
"We found vulnerabilities, postures of users asking to be corrected referring to poorly configured workstations, where to risky downloads. “ It helped us get through the Covid-19 phase calmly. And, in the medium term, the analysis of these deviations... will also allow us to set up safeguards, in order to enter into a process of continuous improvement " - Pascal Mary
"The real solution here is the combination of both user-friendly software and thought leadership on business process to effectively execute on RFP responses. " - Nick Fitzsimmons
Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.
Microsoft Sharepoint
Focus area
Microsoft Sharepoint is better than Responsive, formerly RFPIO for
Software Failure Risk
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Focus area
Responsive, formerly RFPIO is better than Microsoft Sharepoint for
Software Failure Risk
About
Microsoft - Official Home Page
RFP software to simplify responses to RFPs, DDQs
Age
1975
2015
Financials
IPO
SERIES A
Business Need
Total Processes
(we found evidences for)
125
76
Total Goals
(we found evidences for)
20
13
Top Processes
Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction
Top Goals
Goals Achieved
-
Improve internal communications
-
Scale best practices
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Acquire customers
-
Launch new products
-
Improve efficiency
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Improve ROI
-
Manage risk
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Grow market share
-
Improve visibility
-
Improve stakeholder relations
-
Enter new markets internationally or locally
-
Build brand awareness
-
Establish thought leadership
-
Improve consistency
-
Improve navigation
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Improve brand engagement
- See 17 more
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Improve ROI
-
Acquire customers
-
Enter new markets internationally or locally
-
Scale best practices
-
Establish thought leadership
-
Improve internal communications
-
Improve consistency
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Improve visibility
-
Grow market share
-
Build brand awareness
- See 10 more
Top Channels
Channels Used
-
offline
-
point of sale
-
e-mail
-
phone calls
-
trade shows
-
user generated content
-
blogs
-
games
-
events
-
on premises
-
chat
-
website
-
Slack
-
video
-
promotions
-
out of home
-
brochure
-
print media
-
magazine
-
mobile
-
causes and charity
-
movies
- See 19 more
-
offline
-
point of sale
-
e-mail
-
phone calls
-
trade shows
-
user generated content
-
blogs
-
games
-
events
-
on premises
-
chat
-
website
-
Slack
-
video
-
promotions
-
out of home
-
brochure
-
print media
-
magazine
-
mobile
-
causes and charity
-
movies
- See 19 more
Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?
Compliance Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Security & Privacy Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Integration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Migration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
IT and Other Capabilities
- Low
- Medium
- High
