Comparison Summary
This comparison report of Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs. Conga Composer is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 7830 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.
Introducing Responsive, formerly RFPIO and Conga Composer
Responsive, formerly RFPIO, Conga Composer, Loopio RFP, ClientPoint, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Proposal Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.
Responsive, formerly RFPIO covers Sales Document Management, Collaboration, Content Management, Workflow Management, etc.
Conga Composer focuses on Sales Document Management, Workflow Management, Generation Of New Leads, Engagement Management, etc.
"The real solution here is the combination of both user-friendly software and thought leadership on business process to effectively execute on RFP responses. " - Nick Fitzsimmons
"After implementing Grid and Composer, we essentially had an end-to-end process in Salesforce that didn’t exist before. It was a disjointed process across a plethora of systems that didn’t talk to each other. But now, not even a year later, the impac...t on the business and the visibility that exists because we forced the end-to-end process into Salesforce is unreal. " - Leslie Carrigan
Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Focus area
Responsive, formerly RFPIO is better than Conga Composer for
Software Failure Risk
Conga Composer
Focus area
Conga Composer is better than Responsive, formerly RFPIO for
Software Failure Risk
About
RFP software to simplify responses to RFPs, DDQs
Customize, streamline and scale document generation and reporting for unlimited use cases
Age
2015
Financials
SERIES A
PRIVATE
Business Need
Total Processes
(we found evidences for)
76
51
Total Goals
(we found evidences for)
13
14
Top Processes
Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction
Top Goals
Goals Achieved
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Improve ROI
-
Acquire customers
-
Enter new markets internationally or locally
-
Scale best practices
-
Establish thought leadership
-
Improve internal communications
-
Improve consistency
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Improve visibility
-
Grow market share
-
Build brand awareness
- See 10 more
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Acquire customers
-
Improve ROI
-
Build brand awareness
-
Improve consistency
-
Improve internal communications
-
Improve visibility
-
Launch new products
-
Grow market share
-
Scale best practices
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Improve efficiency
- See 11 more
Top Channels
Channels Used
-
e-mail
-
website
-
offline
-
phone calls
-
point of sale
-
causes and charity
-
games
-
text SMS
-
promotions
-
trade shows
-
mobile
-
video
-
on premises
-
events
-
mobile app
-
social media
-
LinkedIn
-
mass media
-
television
- See 16 more
-
e-mail
-
website
-
offline
-
phone calls
-
point of sale
-
causes and charity
-
games
-
text SMS
-
promotions
-
trade shows
-
mobile
-
video
-
on premises
-
events
-
mobile app
-
social media
-
LinkedIn
-
mass media
-
television
- See 16 more
Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?
Compliance Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Security & Privacy Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Integration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Migration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
IT and Other Capabilities
- Low
- Medium
- High
