Comparison Summary
This comparison report of Responsive, formerly RFPIO vs. Hyland Governance is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 4772 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.
Introducing Responsive, formerly RFPIO and Hyland Governance
Responsive, formerly RFPIO, Loopio RFP, ClientPoint, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Proposal Management, whereas Hyland Governance, Reltio, Hive Marketing Cloud, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Customer Data Platform. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.
Responsive, formerly RFPIO covers Sales Document Management, Collaboration, Content Management, Workflow Management, etc.
Hyland Governance focuses on Workflow Management, Sales Document Management with Offline, Content Management, Collaboration, etc.
"I remember scrolling through the help center, ‘liking’ another user’s suggestion, and then seeing it implemented in the tool a few weeks later. I’ve never seen another company really listen to customer requests and ideas—and then act on them so quic...kly. " - Cristina Ethridge
"Zia was instrumental in helping us define how to best leverage Alfresco to meet our document and records management needs. Zia was extremely open to sharing their expertise with our technology team so that we can continue developing our own Alfresco... workflows and content processes. We look forward to working with Zia on future Alfresco projects. " - Karen Stauffer
Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.
Responsive, formerly RFPIO
Focus area
Responsive, formerly RFPIO is better than Hyland Governance for
Software Failure Risk
About
RFP software to simplify responses to RFPs, DDQs
Information Governance Software
Age
2015
1991
Financials
SERIES A
M&A
Business Need
Total Processes
(we found evidences for)
76
40
Total Goals
(we found evidences for)
13
6
Top Processes
Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction
Top Goals
Goals Achieved
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Improve ROI
-
Acquire customers
-
Enter new markets internationally or locally
-
Scale best practices
-
Establish thought leadership
-
Improve internal communications
-
Improve consistency
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Shorten ramp up time
-
Improve visibility
-
Grow market share
-
Build brand awareness
- See 10 more
-
Increase sales & revenue
-
Enhance customer relationships
-
Scale best practices
-
Improve visibility
-
Improve digital and social presence
-
Establish thought leadership
- See 3 more
Top Channels
Channels Used
-
offline
-
point of sale
-
mobile
-
social media
-
mobile app
-
user generated content
-
blogs
-
phone calls
-
website
-
on premises
- See 7 more
-
offline
-
point of sale
-
mobile
-
social media
-
mobile app
-
user generated content
-
blogs
-
phone calls
-
website
-
on premises
- See 7 more
Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?
Compliance Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Security & Privacy Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Integration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
Migration Risk
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
{{{rsh_C_1}}}
IT and Other Capabilities
- Low
- Medium
- High
