cuspera logo CUSPERA

RingCentral MVP vs ginstr: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of RingCentral MVP vs. ginstr is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 5105 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing RingCentral MVP and ginstr

RingCentral MVP, ginstr, Mobile2CRM, CallHub, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Mobile Marketing. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

RingCentral MVP covers Collaboration with Offline, Sales Call Management with Phone Calls, Conference Call Management with Offline, Communication Management with Phone Calls, etc.

ginstr focuses on Sales Document Management with Offline, Workflow Management with Mobile, Advertisement with Website, Product Marketing, etc.

"The lockdowns could have been a big challenge to our operations, especially for the 500 people in our corporate offices who hadn’t previously worked remotely. But because we had RingCentral, I think we managed to stay even more connected as a team t...han we would’ve in the office. Having our work phone, team chat, and video conferencing in the same app made it so easy to collaborate. " - Gary Megson

"The ginstr solution is more affordable compared to our previous system and other industry-specific solutions, for both the initial package and the running costs. " - Evelyn Neushaus

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo RingCentral MVP

Focus area

RingCentral MVP is better than ginstr for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo ginstr

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Unified Platform that combines messaging, video, and phone calls

Workflow management for reliable & real-time insight on mobile operations

Age

2003

Financials

IPO

PRIVATE

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

60

8

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

10

1

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


sales call management

meeting management



conference call management


communication management

tracking & monitoring communications

sending & publishing communications


helpdesk management


contact list management


sales document management

contract management

proposal & quote management


workflow management


engagement management

engaging and following up


training & onboarding


social media management

social media analytics



competitive intelligence




content management


campaign management


customer case management




revenue cycle management


performance management


customer feedback management

measuring customer satisfaction


products & pricelist management


lifetime value management



Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Improve internal communications

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Acquire customers

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve ROI

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Manage risk

  • See 7 more
  • Improve internal communications

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • offline

  • on premises

  • point of sale

  • video

  • mobile

  • website

  • See 3 more
  • offline

  • on premises

  • point of sale

  • video

  • mobile

  • website

  • See 3 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting