cuspera logo CUSPERA

RingCentral MVP vs iPEGS: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of RingCentral MVP vs. iPEGS is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 5156 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing RingCentral MVP and iPEGS

RingCentral MVP, iPEGS, Mobile2CRM, CallHub, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help Mobile Marketing. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

RingCentral MVP covers Collaboration with Offline, Sales Call Management with Phone Calls, Conference Call Management with Offline, Communication Management with Phone Calls, etc.

iPEGS focuses on Engagement Management with E-Mail, Sales Document Management, Business Development, Customer Case Management, etc.

"By migrating our company to RingCentral and RingCentral Contact Center, we’ve replaced an IT communications infrastructure that was stifling our operations with one that’s actually helping us grow. " - Praveen Boppana

"We had lots of historic forms that needed reviewing, and at the same time, we wanted to reduce the amount of paperwork. Some of our client consent forms were seven pages long which had to be printed out for each consultation. This became very time-c...onsuming. Using the iPEGS electronic forms, they get immediately pinged back to us as soon as they are completed and then stored against the client's file in a safe and secure place. The job is done! Since moving to electronic consent forms and allowing our clients to complete the form on an iPad, we have noticed that clients appear to be a lot more engaged and involved in the consultation process. " - DR Eric Toni

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo RingCentral MVP

Focus area

RingCentral MVP is better than iPEGS for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo iPEGS

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

About

Unified Platform that combines messaging, video, and phone calls

GO PAPERLESS WITH iPEGS ELECTRONIC FORMS

Age

2003

Financials

IPO

PRIVATE

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

60

15

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

10

4

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


sales call management

meeting management



conference call management


communication management

tracking & monitoring communications

sending & publishing communications


helpdesk management


contact list management


sales document management

contract management

proposal & quote management


workflow management


engagement management

engaging and following up


training & onboarding


social media management

social media analytics



competitive intelligence




content management


campaign management


customer case management




revenue cycle management


performance management


customer feedback management

measuring customer satisfaction


products & pricelist management


lifetime value management



business development


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Improve internal communications

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Acquire customers

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve ROI

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Manage risk

  • See 7 more
  • Acquire customers

  • Build brand awareness

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Scale best practices

  • See 1 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • e-mail

  • phone calls

  • offline

  • on premises

  • See 1 more
  • e-mail

  • phone calls

  • offline

  • on premises

  • See 1 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting