cuspera logo CUSPERA

Salesforce Revenue Cloud vs Model N Global Pricing Management Software: 2024 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Salesforce Revenue Cloud vs. Model N Global Pricing Management Software is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 5358 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Salesforce Revenue Cloud and Model N Global Pricing Management Software

Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Model N Global Pricing Management Software, ConnectWise Sell, Oracle CPQ Cloud, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help CPQ. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Salesforce Revenue Cloud covers Sales Document Management, Products & Pricelist Management, Engagement Management, Workflow Management, etc.

Model N Global Pricing Management Software focuses on International Marketing, Social Media Management, Sales Document Management, Forecasting, etc.

"Data is foundational, but it is only the beginning of the journey. We’re moving advanced analytics right to the forefront of our engagement strategy. " - Rob Birse

"Our objective for a CPQ solution was to make selling easier for our sales force and to ensure more accurate offers and quotes. We tested several solutions in an intensive selection process and only Revvy CPQ meets all of our specifications. " - Friedrich Kroiss

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Focus area

Salesforce Revenue Cloud is better than Model N Global Pricing Management Software for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo Model N Global Pricing Management Software

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

About

Revenue management solution to streamline revenue lifecycle

Model N | optimize and protect prices globally throughout the entire lifecycle

Age

1999

1999

Financials

IPO

PRIVATE

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

93

16

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

16

4

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


sales document management

proposal & quote management

contract management


engagement management

engaging and following up


products & pricelist management


workflow management


contact list management

creating contact list




bundling of products


generation of new leads



training & onboarding



communication management

tracking & monitoring communications

sending & publishing communications


account management


helpdesk management


pipeline management


subscription management



campaign management

campaign analytics


promotion management


discount management


revenue cycle management


sales call management


customer feedback management

measuring customer satisfaction





social media management

social media analytics




knowledge management


content management


conversion management


competitive intelligence


business development


billing and invoice management



relationship management


renewal management



loyalty management



opportunity management



lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic







international marketing


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Acquire customers

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Improve ROI

  • Improve internal communications

  • Grow market share

  • Build brand awareness

  • Scale best practices

  • Increase average basket value

  • Launch new products

  • Improve brand engagement

  • Improve visibility

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • See 13 more
  • Launch new products

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Improve efficiency

  • See 1 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

No Data

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

No Data

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting