cuspera logo CUSPERA

Streak vs Giveffect: 2025 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Streak vs. Giveffect is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 3224 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Streak and Giveffect

Streak, Giveffect, NetHunt CRM, Agile CRM, etc., belong to a category of solutions that help CRM. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Streak covers Communication Management with E-Mail, Engagement Management with E-Mail, Workflow Management, Contact List Management with E-Mail, etc.

Giveffect focuses on Helpdesk Management with Offline, Relationship Management with Offline, Engagement Management with Offline, Campaign Management with E-Mail, etc.

"I use Streak primarily for my hiring. It allows me to manage people in every stage of the hiring process, continually stay in touch, and keep notes on each person. I could not live without it. " - Shelby Black

"We're trying to use Giveffect for everything. We want to spend responsible dollars to do as much as we can in every aspect of our Habitat affiliate, especially in nonprofit software. In summary, these are the departments that use the Giveffect nonpr...ofit software: mortgage management, business administrative office, marketing and communications, volunteer and community outreach, family partnerships, and pretty soon, Habitat ReStore. " - Kevin Miller

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Streak

Focus area

Streak is better than Giveffect for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

logo Giveffect

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • low

About

Streak | CRM In Your Inbox | Your CRM Right Inside Gmail‎

All-In-One Nonprofit Software

Financials

PRIVATE

PRIVATE

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

76

39

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

10

4

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction


communication management

tracking & monitoring communications

sending & publishing communications


engagement management

engaging and following up


workflow management


contact list management

creating contact list




sales document management

contract management

proposal & quote management



generation of new leads


pipeline management


helpdesk management



promotion management



relationship management


content management


campaign management

campaign analytics

campaign monitoring


business development


training & onboarding


conversion management


discount management



follower management



products & pricelist management


account management




lifetime value management


knowledge management




sales call management


referral management



social media management


membership management


performance management


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Acquire customers

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Scale best practices

  • Improve internal communications

  • Launch new products

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Grow market share

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • Improve ROI

  • See 7 more
  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Acquire customers

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • See 1 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • e-mail

  • offline

  • causes and charity

  • website

  • chat

  • newsletter

  • mobile

  • phone calls

  • mobile app

  • See 6 more
  • e-mail

  • offline

  • causes and charity

  • website

  • chat

  • newsletter

  • mobile

  • phone calls

  • mobile app

  • See 6 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting