cuspera logo CUSPERA

Enghouse Insights vs Thematic: 2025 Ultimate Comparison Guide

Comparison Summary

This comparison report of Enghouse Insights vs. Thematic is based on a specific set of business needs and context. The comparison uses 1445 Cuspera insights based on peer reviews, case studies, testimonials, and expert opinions across 50+ sources.

Introducing Enghouse Insights and Thematic

Enghouse Insights, and Thematic belong to a category of solutions that help Customer Feedback Management. Different products excel in different areas, so the best platform for your business will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

Enghouse Insights covers Market Research, Helpdesk Management with Phone Calls, Collecting Feedback with Website, Engaging Conversational Surveys, etc.

Thematic focuses on Customer Feedback Management, Engagement Management with Chat, Helpdesk Management with Phone Calls, Market Research, etc.

"We have used Nebu products at YouthSight for nearly 10 years now and have yet to come across another offering that integrates a panel database so well with a survey design and fieldwork system. Michael Virks Operations Director at YouthSight Nebu's ...London, United Kingdom fully-featured, timesaving Dub Knowledge Panel Management suite deserves special mention; it reliably handles our demanding data requirements. " - Michael Virks

"The most valuable tools for me were the impact and comparison tools. It was clear, visual, and quick to see the impact. It was just right. " - Sam Gribben

Unsure which of these solutions is right for you? Our Cuspera AI engine can compare them based on your needs and specific to your industry and context. Get your personalized report today.


logo Enghouse Insights

Focus area

Software Failure Risk

  • medium

logo Thematic

Focus area

Thematic is better than Enghouse Insights for

Software Failure Risk

  • low

About

Technology for data-driven decision making

Feedback Analysis Platform to Unlock the value of product

Financials

PRIVATE

SEED

Business Need

Total Processes
(we found evidences for)

18

37

Total Goals
(we found evidences for)

1

11

Top Processes

Evidences indicate better relative satisfaction



helpdesk management


customer feedback management


engagement management

engaging and following up


training & onboarding


workflow management


knowledge management


social media analytics


social media management

social media analytics


rating and review management


sales review & feedback


generation of new leads


customise loyalty program


loyalty management

customise loyalty program




lead qualification: technographic


lead qualification

lead qualification: technographic


lifetime value management


Top Goals

Goals Achieved

  • Grow market share

  • Enhance customer relationships

  • Acquire customers

  • Improve ROI

  • Scale best practices

  • Increase sales & revenue

  • Improve brand engagement

  • Improve stakeholder relations

  • Enter new markets internationally or locally

  • Improve consistency

  • Improve efficiency

  • Improve digital and social presence

  • See 8 more

Top Channels

Channels Used

  • phone calls

  • chat

  • social media

  • promotions

  • offline

  • point of sale

  • LinkedIn

  • e-mail

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • mobile

  • trade shows

  • mobile app

  • website

  • on premises

  • See 12 more
  • phone calls

  • chat

  • social media

  • promotions

  • offline

  • point of sale

  • LinkedIn

  • e-mail

  • user generated content

  • blogs

  • mobile

  • trade shows

  • mobile app

  • website

  • on premises

  • See 12 more

Failure Risk Guidance Security Report?

Low Medium High
Low Medium High

Compliance Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Security & Privacy Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Integration Risk

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

low

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Migration Risk

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

medium

{{{rsh_C_1}}}

Business Setting